Posted by Jonathan on 09/15/98 14:07:38:
In Reply to: Re: Another Review!!!! posted by Jonathan on 09/15/98 13:50:41:
Why do you think D2K is so bad? What's gameplay for you? don't tell me C&C had more startegy than Dune2 and don't tell me that C&C was better than Dune2, so what's left? D2K's interface isn't innovative but great, its graphics are goergeos even though they're not TV quality, I've seen many graphics in much better quality which were just ugly. Its music is not redbook quality but it's better than most redbook quality scoores, and don't tell me the gameplay isn't innovative 'coz the units behave so differently than they did in Dune2 that their name is often mainly what they share. Isn't that enough? I tell you what, you're not looking for a game, you're looking for a breakthrough, so you'll never be satisfied, but I'm not looking for the flashiest features, because the depth of the gameplay is what's important, and Dune2 had the best of that, which D2K succeeds, but D2K makes many many changes to the gameplay - you might say that there are several new units now and that each house has a very different arsenal due to the fact that shared units behave differently for each house. What's medicore here? please post an explanation of why this is medicore (I mean it).
Follow Ups:
